Press Enter to Search
Is communicating via email and text still a pipe dream for your collection operations? If so, you might want to settle in and keep reading. It really isn’t as scary as you might expect.
Despite the high costs and marginal returns of relying on phone calls and printed letters, many ARM agencies and healthcare providers have yet to embrace email and text. Widespread confusion and uncertainty about various state and federal requirements (including the proposed CFPB rules and E-Sign) can make digital communication an intolerable compliance risk.
I recently had the pleasure of discussing email and text compliance standards as well as their practical implications for businesses with David Kaminski, chair of the Consumer Financial Services Law Practice at Carlson & Messer LLP in Los Angeles. Although we weren’t in a position to offer legal advice, our goal was to help listeners better understand the laws governing electronic channels so they can move forward with greater confidence.
Here are a few of the topics David and I covered in detail during part 1 of our two-part webinar, Email Is Hot, Texting Is Hotter: Don’t Be the First to Get Burned.”

Legally Speaking, Emails are Considered Writings

Emails are writings. If sent to a consumer by a third-party debt collector, emails must comply with the  Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (or FDCPA). If the email communication pertains to healthcare debt, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) applies.
Emails trigger compliance with the CAN SPAM Act as well, meaning they must (among the law’s other requirements) include an opt out or unsubscribe provision. Emails must also include any state-required disclosures and special verbiage requirements.
There is no legal requirement per se to obtain the consumer’s consent to email. This means third-party collection agencies may rely on client-provided email addresses. Just remember to include the required opt out/unsubscribe language in the body of every consumer-facing email and, as a routine practice, ask consumers to confirm their consent for you to email the particular address.
Whether you’re sending legally required documents via email or text, you’ll need E-Sign consent (more on that below).

Legally Speaking, Text Messages are Considered Calls

Text messages are calls. As such, texts must comply with the requirements of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). The TCPA requires the “calling” party to obtain the express prior consent of the consumer associated with the mobile phone number.
The TCPA is not limited to debt collection calls. In fact, it applies to any person placing a call or text to a consumer using the consumer’s mobile number. As is the case with emails, text messages sent to a consumer by a third-party debt collector must comply with the FDCPA.
Text messages initiated by a third-party debt collection agency are subject to call restrictions and auto dialer rules, and frequency of delivery can run afoul of state harassment laws and FDCPA laws. If you don’t have TCPA-mandated consent, you may be subject to legal action. Even prior verbal consent is fine, as long as you record it for legal purposes.
Mobile numbers are often reassigned, so consider the source of the number you’re using and the currency of the information to gauge the risk of third-party disclosure. Certain technologies can determine whether a mobile number has been deactivated or ported and, if so, block any further text communications.
As a practical matter, both emails and text messages may contain links to secure URLs and must encrypt data at rest and in transit.
“People think, ‘If I’m sending an email, I’m not really bothering anybody, they can get an email anytime. Although Federal and state call time restrictions do not apply to emails, excessive emailing could be viewed as harassment and cause the agency to be blacklisted.” – David Kaminski

When and How Does E-Sign Apply?

Informal consent and formal consent (E-Sign) come into play at different times, depending on the nature of the communication. Informal consent relates to getting the consumer’s permission to use email or text to relay basic information—payment receipts, account balance, verifying a payment plan, etc. Formal consent, or E-Sign, is needed for all legally required notices.
For an initial communication—which you would use to introduce your organization and purpose, confirm you’re dealing with the correct person, and secure permission to use that channel—E-Sign is not needed. You’re free to send your 1692G notice in that first communication. But for validation notices and other legally required documents not included in the initial communication (a post-dated payment notice, for example), E-Sign is a must.
“E-Sign has been an enigma for so many of you. Everyone has come up to me and said, ‘What is this E-Sign? I don’t really understand it. People throw it around like a frisbee.’ Rozanne and I are going to really lay out what it is, what it means, what you need to be concerned about, and how to launch your program.” – David Kaminski

What Should Collectors Consider When Crafting Emails and Texts?

You’ll need to think carefully about how emails and texts are worded and what they will include. Even the most (seemingly) minor details can mean the difference between a positive, productive interaction and a costly legal challenge.
For emails, you’ll want to include your true name in the “From” field (an attorney might advise you to use a DBA), keep subject lines simple and professional (e.g., “Your [Creditor Name] Account,” “Your Payment Date”), and avoid any verbiage that might trigger a spam filter.
Text messages must include certain disclosures as required by the Cellular Telephone and Internet Association (CTIA). Short codes can be used in text messages to allow consumers self-service options such as accessing account information, making payments, and communicating with you. Avoid using words that could be confusing, misleading, or inflammatory. If you don’t have prior written consent, including any type of marketing or solicitation in a text message can land you in hot water.
“Just be careful when you’re rolling out the language that you’re going to be using in your text messages to consumers. Make sure you’re not using something that will mislead, misrepresent, or potentially even harass the consumer, especially when you’re looking at federal and state laws.” – David Kaminski

Coming Up: Creating the Right Setup for Compliant Emails and Texts

In the second half of this blog series, I’ll recap the rest of my discussion with David about emails and texts—particularly when it comes to technology and what you’ll need to launch a program you can trust. Stay tuned for more actionable insights from our two-part webinar, Email Is Hot, Texting Is Hotter: Don’t Be the First to Get Burned.”


Disclaimer: Ontario Systems is a technology company and provides this blog article solely for general informational and marketing purposes. You should not rely on the content of this material for any other purpose or as specific guidance for your company. Ontario Systems’ advice, services, tools and products described herein do not guarantee compliance with any law or industry standard. You are ultimately responsible for your own company’s actions and compliance efforts. Because everyone’s situation is different, you must consult your own attorneys, accountants, and/or other advisors to obtain specific advice on your company’s compliance, legal, tax, regulatory and/or other business needs. Despite Ontario Systems’ efforts to provide current and up-to-date information, you need to recognize that the information contained herein may become outdated quickly and may contain errors and/or other inaccuracies.

© 2019 Ontario Systems, LLC. All rights reserved. Information contained in this document is subject to change. Reproduction of this publication is not permitted without the express permission of Ontario Systems, LLC.

Info and Insights You Won't Want to Miss

Here on the OS Blog, we aim to give you just the right mix of high-level views, tactics, and tools you can use to optimize your collection operations and results. Subscribe today for a steady stream of practical, empowering content delivered to your inbox weekly.

Posted by Rozanne Andersen

Rozanne Andersen, J.D., serves as Ontario Systems’ Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer. She is responsible for leading Ontario Systems’ corporate efforts and response to the CFPB’s launch of compliance examinations in the ARM industry. Rozanne's advocacy work on behalf of the credit and collection industry has resulted in landmark legislation and regulation at both the state level and the federal level with regard to the FDCPA, FCRA and HIPAA. In 2020, Rozanne was named Chief Compliance Officer of the Year (Large Company) by the international Women in Compliance Network.
All Posts